Ohio Issue 2

This area is for discussions that do not fit into the formal firearms discussions of the website. Common sense and non-controversial contributions are expected. Certain topics are forbidden. See the forum rules for more details.

Moderators: Coordinators, Moderators

Ohio Issue 2

Postby Cruiser » Tue Sep 12, 2017 2:59 pm

Does anyone really understand this? Some say drug prices under this will increase for Seniors?
I am confused.
Abandon ye all HOPE!
User avatar
OFCC Member
OFCC Member
Posts: 10804
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 6:41 pm
Location: Mercer County, Ohio - what is yours?

Re: Ohio Issue 2

Postby DontTreadOnMe » Tue Sep 12, 2017 3:15 pm

It looks like nonsense to me. The VA doesn't disclose what they pay, so there's no way to comply with this. This is from a quick googling:

The main sponsor of the initiative is the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, a California group that bills itself as the largest provider of HIV/AIDS medical care in the U.S. It funded the collection of signatures to get the measure on the ballot.

The foundation pushed a similar, but not identical, measure in California last year. Proposition 61 failed after the pharmaceutical industry spent more than $100 million to defeat it. That measure would have exempted Medicaid managed care plans from its drug price regulations, whereas the Ohio initiative would not.

It's another out-of-state initiative. If this were such a great idea, it could've been accomplished by a grass-roots effort funded by Ohioans.
User avatar
OFCC Patron Member
OFCC Patron Member
Posts: 1644
Joined: Wed May 02, 2012 11:11 am
Location: SW Ohio

Re: Ohio Issue 2

Postby techmike » Fri Sep 15, 2017 8:39 pm

I just received a "voter's guide" to Issue 2 in the mail. It was sent by "noonissue2.org". Interesting reading. There are sure a buttload of Ohio orginizations against it.
"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms."
- Samuel Adams, Massachusetts Ratifying Convention, 1788
User avatar
OFCC Coordinator
OFCC Coordinator
Posts: 1400
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 10:42 pm
Location: Toledo

Re: Ohio Issue 2

Postby Bruenor » Fri Sep 15, 2017 9:24 pm

The pharmaceutical industry said straight out if this passes they will raise prices to compensate. Opposition says they will be heavily fined by the govt if they do. Not sure how Govt is supposed to dictate pricing to private industry. Govt can negotiate pricing yes, dictate no (unless the industry becomes nationalized, at which point we would be like Venezuela). I have no reason to believe the pharmaceutical industry won't raise prices to maintain their profit margins if this passes. Does anyone else think they are lying ?

also found this interesting

The promoters of Issue 2 also wrote into it an unprecedented provision giving themselves the right to intervene at taxpayer expense in any legal challenges that may be filed against it if it becomes law. This provision would give the sponsors a blank check to defend any part of the law, and require that their legal fees be reimbursed by taxpayers whether they win or lose.
Μολὼν λαβέ

"Arms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. . . Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them."

- Thomas Paine
User avatar
Posts: 6217
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 3:03 pm
Location: Geneva, OH

Re: Ohio Issue 2

Postby HancockCountyHAl » Sat Sep 16, 2017 10:39 pm

I'm in a quandary. The Cleveland plain Dealer is opposed to it, but crazy Bernie is for it.
User avatar
Posts: 1096
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2010 7:48 pm
Location: Hancock County, Ohio

Re: Ohio Issue 2

Postby JimE » Fri Nov 03, 2017 5:56 pm

Well, I just saw a TV ad by Dennis Kucinich supporting it.
That kinda support tells me a lot about what will happen if it is passed.
OFCC Member
OFCC Member
Posts: 318
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2005 7:50 pm
Location: Ashland,OH

Re: Ohio Issue 2

Postby Tru-Heathen » Fri Nov 03, 2017 8:36 pm

I finally sat down and read the arguments for and against each of the two issues up for voting this coming Tuesday.


I'm voting against both of them.
A wayfarer should not walk unarmed,
But have his weapons to hand:
He knows not when he may need a spear,
Or what menace meet on the road.

- Verse 38 from the Havamal, the Wisdom of Odin.
User avatar
Posts: 662
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 1:17 pm
Location: Hardin County

Re: Ohio Issue 2

Postby WestonDon » Fri Nov 03, 2017 8:38 pm

I don't understand it either. Way to much conjecture and not enough hard facts. I don't believe half of it and don't care about the rest. Two things I believe for sure is that the sponsors of this are not pushing this for the benefit of the people of Ohio. They have something to gain. I don't know what but it must be something very valuable. Probably at the expense of the good citizens of Ohio. I'm agin' it.
I believe in American exceptianalism
Fear the government that fears your guns
NRA endowment life member
OFCC Patron Member
OFCC Patron Member
Posts: 2558
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:30 pm
Location: Wood county

Re: Ohio Issue 2

Postby SMMAssociates » Sat Nov 04, 2017 4:32 am

I was going to vote for it, due to the extreme push against it :D....

Then I figured out the lawsuit thing.

If the thing loses, IMHO, it's "status quo", and they'll try something else.

If it passes (ignore the "features" - the stuff that's supposed to keep prices down), and one of the proponents is sued for about anything related to the bill (I wonder if that wouldn't include other issues), WE pay their legal bills. Huh?

Ohio's goofy legal system allows interested individuals to get stuff on the ballot. Other than total silliness issues (remember King Canute?), I don't think there's anything to stop you.

Sometimes we have to read the small print....

It might be useful for us without the lawsuit language, but NOT with it....

Just IMHO.


(Why write a quick note when you can write a novel?)

(Why do those who claim to wish to protect me feel that the best way to do that is to disarm me?)

יזכר לא עד פעם
User avatar
Posts: 9494
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:36 am
Location: Youngstown OH

Re: Ohio Issue 2

Postby WhyNot » Sat Nov 04, 2017 5:47 am

No pro-issue ads or info put out from supporters speaks volumes.

Perhaps 8) they are already planning a second, third, fourth attempt. Like the casino thingie or worse, YOUR local school tax raises commonly referred to as levies. Peck, peck, peck, badger, badger, badger, harass :shock: ....we won and the ppl have spoken! We threw enuff darts and finally hit! (and with that the ppl must have NOT spoken the other 4-5-6 votes)

Perhaps they are planning an off-election season vote i.e. May ballot, and counting on low voter turn out 8)

There needs to be a '3 strikes you're out ' law, whereas the school or whoever can only reinitiate the ballot issue 3X in so many years, or a mandatory wait for XXX years if failed XXX times.

Alas the necessity of forward think'n by the OGA.
Acquisitions thus far:

Butter knife
sharpened pencil
Newspaper roll
water balloon (diversionary)

Yeah, I'm that good
Posts: 508
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:23 am
Location: NW Ohio

Re: Ohio Issue 2

Postby 147Doc » Sat Nov 04, 2017 7:31 pm

WhyNot wrote:No pro-issue ads or info put out from supporters speaks volumes.

There have been several down at this end of the state. More anti- than pro-, but some of the pro-bill ads are damned slick, and tug at heartstrings. If an average citizen had seen them first, or only...
OFCC Patron Member
OFCC Patron Member
Posts: 636
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 8:31 pm
Location: NE Cincinnati Metro Area

Return to Jeff Kirchner's Korner

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot] and 3 guests