We have the actual sub bill on Facebook
https://lookaside.fbsbx.com/file/Sub%20 ... 87lBqbG-Dm
If you don't have Facebook pm me and I wil email it to you tonight
Ohio: Right to Carry Reform Bill Moves on to 5th Hearing
Moderators: Coordinators, Moderators
19 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Ohio: Right to Carry Reform Bill Moves on to 5th Hearing
by Chuck » Mon Sep 18, 2017 10:35 am
Ain't activism fun?
"Associate with men of good quality if you esteem your own reputation; for it is better to be alone than in bad company. " - George Washington
"I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do something.
And because I can not do everything, I will not refuse to do the something I can do.
What I can do, I should do. And what I should do, by the grace of GOD, I will do."- Edward Everett Hale (descendant of Nathan Hale)
"Associate with men of good quality if you esteem your own reputation; for it is better to be alone than in bad company. " - George Washington
"I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do something.
And because I can not do everything, I will not refuse to do the something I can do.
What I can do, I should do. And what I should do, by the grace of GOD, I will do."- Edward Everett Hale (descendant of Nathan Hale)
-
Chuck - OFCC Director
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 7:06 am
- Location: Licking County
Re: Ohio: Right to Carry Reform Bill Moves on to 5th Hearing
by Cruiser » Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:23 am
Chuck wrote:We have the actual sub bill on Facebook
https://lookaside.fbsbx.com/file/Sub%20 ... 87lBqbG-Dm
If you don't have Facebook pm me and I wil email it to you tonight
That loaded a PDF!
Abandon ye all HOPE!
-
Cruiser - OFCC Member
- Posts: 10808
- Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 6:41 pm
- Location: Mercer County, Ohio - what is yours?
Re: Ohio: Right to Carry Reform Bill Moves on to 5th Hearing
by Chuck » Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:37 am
That's what the bill is
Ain't activism fun?
"Associate with men of good quality if you esteem your own reputation; for it is better to be alone than in bad company. " - George Washington
"I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do something.
And because I can not do everything, I will not refuse to do the something I can do.
What I can do, I should do. And what I should do, by the grace of GOD, I will do."- Edward Everett Hale (descendant of Nathan Hale)
"Associate with men of good quality if you esteem your own reputation; for it is better to be alone than in bad company. " - George Washington
"I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do something.
And because I can not do everything, I will not refuse to do the something I can do.
What I can do, I should do. And what I should do, by the grace of GOD, I will do."- Edward Everett Hale (descendant of Nathan Hale)
-
Chuck - OFCC Director
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 7:06 am
- Location: Licking County
Re: Ohio: Right to Carry Reform Bill Moves on to 5th Hearing
by DontTreadOnMe » Mon Sep 18, 2017 11:40 am
I just don't understand why the need to present the physical CHL and verbalize having a gun. The second part doesn't add any information, since the only reason to provide the CHL is to inform the officer about the gun.
Unless the reason is to trip up licensees (including out-of-state licensees who will be less familiar with these kind of trip-ups) to allow for the charge. If that's the reason, then it make perfect sense.
It's better than what we've got now, since it clarifies when notification is required to a much more easily understood standard, gets rid of the "must notify every law enforcement officer" thing that got a licensee a while back, and gets rid of the less-than-completely-clear "must promptly notify" part. Still it's not as good as it could be and does have some pitfalls.
Unless the reason is to trip up licensees (including out-of-state licensees who will be less familiar with these kind of trip-ups) to allow for the charge. If that's the reason, then it make perfect sense.
It's better than what we've got now, since it clarifies when notification is required to a much more easily understood standard, gets rid of the "must notify every law enforcement officer" thing that got a licensee a while back, and gets rid of the less-than-completely-clear "must promptly notify" part. Still it's not as good as it could be and does have some pitfalls.
-
DontTreadOnMe - OFCC Patron Member
- Posts: 1644
- Joined: Wed May 02, 2012 11:11 am
- Location: SW Ohio
19 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Return to Ohio Concealed Carry Discussion
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests